There are many appalling things I have learned to tolerate over the years except one: the lack of common sense. You can correct uncivilized manners, you can control vulgar speech, you can put a stop to violence but you can never treat stupidity. Few days ago I have read in the papers something utterly outrageous. According to Gheorghe Pogea – the Romanian finance minister, “in 2015, the public sector employees’ average salary will be in excess of RON 3,400, while the private sector employees will earn 31% less, averaging around RON 2,350”. He then added that “the 25% gap between the public employees (currently earning around RON 2,200) and the private employees (currently earning around RON 1,760) will become 30% in the coming years”. Let’s all move a step back, take a deep breath and start dissecting this common sense atrocity.
It is absolutely correct that the current salary gap between the public and the private sector stands at 25%. By the same token, in 2015 the salary gap will increase to 46%. The finance minister intentionally flipped the gap sign, giving the audience the impression that the private employees will earn 31% less than the famously inefficient and counter-productive public employees. In fact, the private sector employees’ tax contributions will feed into the state budget such that, on average, a public employee will earn 46% more than a private sector employee. At the end of the day this message is aimed at window-dressing the budget deficit in the eyes of the IMF and the Romanian public.
We all remember, back in November 2008, how the President and the National Bank Governor were erroneously predicting steady positive GDP growth for 2009 and vehemently denying the necessity of an IMF loan. The reality could not be further away from their politically-driven estimates:
• Romania’s GDP went down 8.8% in 2009 so far, according to data supplied by the National Statistics Institute
• In May, the IMF agreed for a 2-year stand-by arrangement worth EUR 13 billion whereas EU signed-off for a contribution of EUR 5 billion to the bailout
The rescue package has been agreed under austere conditions in which the Romanian government would take all the necessary measures to ensure that the budget deficit for 2009 would be less than 7.3% of GDP. These measures should translate into spending cuts and reductions in public sector wages.
Under these circumstances, the Romanian finance minister is pre-occupied with doubling the current salary gap between the public and the private employees. His magic solution seems to rely solely on surreal economic growth for the next half decade. According to data presented by Mr. Pogea, “in 2010 Romania’s GDP will reach RON 525 billion, from RON 497 billion in 2009 and it will continue to grow to RON 944 billion until 2015”. These estimates could be translated in annualized GDP growth rate terms: 5.6% in 2010 and 12% thereafter until 2015.
Allow me to laugh loudly. If the local government agencies’ forecasting expertise has been totally off for years (“Three Strikes – A Strikeout), I have strong doubts about the accuracy of the aforementioned numbers. Lower than predicted budget revenues (e.g., VAT revenues) combined with higher than predicted budget spending (e.g., growing public sector wages, ever-growing under-funded state pension account) make me believe that new negotiations with IMF will take place in 2011. It is very obvious that the Romanian economy does not have enough private sector employees to financially sustain the double-burden represented by the public sector and the retired population. Consequently, the current limited and expensive access to the sovereign debt market, due to 2008 credit rating downgrade to junk level, will make the negotiations with IMF the only plausible solution. Nonetheless, another loan will never fix the core issues.
Until then, sleep tight Mr. Minister!
Upside Down Meritocracy
Published September 19, 2009 Emerging Markets 9 CommentsTags: Witty Commentary
There are so many things wrong in this country and upside down, that it’s almost impossible to fix them. Not until we don’t have a technocrat government, who doesn’t cares about votes, but is composed of good managers, who know where to cut and where to stimulate, in order to get the economy work as it should.
You are absolutely correct. Unfortunately, many politicians are completely disconnected from the common-sense economics. They are unable to execute at minimum a copy-cat approach when other countries’ strategy has proven to be successful.
Istvan,
I tend to disagree. There are lots of things wrong in this country, but all hope is not lost. Things are not exactly peachy in America either, just look at the health care debate. But there is hope for change.
And paradoxically, I think change can be achieved more easily in Romania than in America: at least in Romania if you are not happy with something, you can bring the case to the attention of the European authorities. Almost for any issue you can find some connection to some European program, so one way or another you can complain. If you create enough preassure, then the European bureaucrats will eventually take notice and do something.
As for the government of technocrats, I’m not so hopeful about that. Just think about Emil’s bowing out because “The Securitate defeated me”. People without chips in the game don’t have the stamina to bring the fight to a finish.
Just my two cents,
Viorel
Viorel,
To tell you the truth, I am not that optimistic about the possibility of change in Romania. When Silviu Brucan claimed in 1990 that Romania would need at least 20 years to come out of the woods, all we did was laugh. Here we are, in 2009, and not much has changed fundamentally. With regard to EU, I have my doubts that Brussels will fix our problems, as long as they have theirs.
hi guys,
just a question, has any of you given much thought to going back and doing something about it? (I assume we have all been living abroad for a while). I have been thinking, but no clear plan just yet
I guess once we make enough cash abroad, and some people will or have already, maybe it’s not bad to do some “service” back home. would be an “interesting” experience, at least.
Bogdan,
Frankly speaking I am thinking about going back there sometimes. In fact I had a short endeavor in 2008. Fair to say, I cannot complain about the quality of time I spent there. Nonetheless, if I tried that again I would do it on my own or with a small group of friends. Since I do know some world class quality people, we can always open a small fund in RO and set-up a nice trading platform.
Hi r2,
You know what people on Wall Street say about how long till they retire: “just a bit longer…”
Yes, I keep thinking about going back, I’d really like to go. But I keep thinking that at this moment I have more opportunities here. However, I’m optimistic. Things are improving a lot in Romania, the private sector is much more robust than 10 years ago, and there are plenty of jobs that pay reasonably, even compared to America. And now with all the bonus scrutiny on Wall Street (all the luck in the elections, Mr Cuomo …), who knows if it will keep making sense to stick around here.
Best,
Viorel
thanks guys. viorel mentioned the bonus scrutiny issue, and it just occurred to me that maybe toni should write a piece on compensation practices in the financial industry sometime. that would make for an interesting reading, what do you think
somehow the public seems to think that if you put a cap on how much one can earn you have eliminated the root cause of all evil in finance. I tend to disagree.
also viorel, do you use bb or reuters messenger? let’s have a word sometime. feel free to e-mail me at r2__d2@live.com thanks
Bogdan,
As for everything cooked-up by the mankind, there is a solution. Within the next couple of topics, I will address this hot topic. Stay tuned!